LeanAPAP

6 Bohr sets

Definition 6.1 Bohr sets
#

Let \(\nu : \widehat{G} \to \mathbb {R}\). The corresponding Bohr set is defined to be

\[ \mathrm{Bohr}(\nu )=\left\{ x\in G : \left\lvert 1-\gamma (x)\right\rvert \leq \nu (\gamma )\textrm{ for all }\gamma \in \Gamma \right\} . \]

The rank of \(\nu \), denoted by \(\mathrm{rk}(\nu )\), is defined to be the size of the set of those \(\gamma \in \widehat{G}\) such that \(\nu (\gamma ){\lt}2\).

(Basic API facts: Bohr sets are symmetric and contain \(0\). Also that, without loss of generality, we can assume \(\nu \) takes only values in \(\mathbb {R}_{\geq 0}\) - I think it might be easier to have the definition allow arbitrary real values, and then switch to non-negative only in proofs where convenient. Or could have the definition only allow non-negative valued functions in the first place.)

Lemma 6.2
#

If \(\rho \in (0,1)\) and \(\nu :\widehat{G}\to \mathbb {R}\) then

\[ \left\lvert \mathrm{Bohr}(\rho \cdot \nu )\right\rvert \geq (\rho /4)^{\mathrm{rk}(\nu )}\left\lvert \mathrm{Bohr}(\nu )\right\rvert . \]
Proof

There are at most \(\lceil 4/\rho \rceil \) many \(z_i\) such that if \(\lvert 1-w\rvert \leq \nu (\gamma )\) then \(\lvert z_i-w\rvert \leq \rho \nu (\gamma )/2\) for some \(i\). Let \(\Gamma =\{ \gamma : \nu (\gamma ) {\lt}2\} \) and define a function \(f:\mathrm{Bohr}(\nu )\to \lceil 2/\rho \rceil ^{\mathrm{rk}(\nu )}\) where for \(\gamma \in \Gamma \) we assign the \(\gamma \)-coordinate of \(f(x)\) as whichever \(j\) has \(\lvert z_j-\gamma (x)\rvert \leq \rho \nu (\gamma )/2\).

By the pigeonhole principle there must exist some \((j_1,\ldots ,j_{d})\) such that \(f^{-1}(j_1,\ldots ,j_d)\) has size at least \((\lceil 2/\rho \rceil )^{-\mathrm{rk}(\nu )}\left\lvert \mathrm{Bohr}(\nu )\right\rvert \). Call this set \(B'\). It must be non-empty, so fix some \(x\in B'\). We claim that \(B'-x\subseteq \left\lvert \mathrm{Bohr}(\rho \cdot \nu )\right\rvert \), which completes the proof.

Suppose that \(z=x+y\) with \(x,y\in B'\), and fix some \(\gamma \in \Gamma \). By assumption there is some \(z_j\in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(\lvert z_j-\gamma (x)\rvert \leq \rho \nu (\gamma )/2\) and \(\lvert z_j-\gamma (y)\rvert \leq \rho \nu (\gamma )/2\). Then by the triangle inequality,

\[ \lvert 1-\gamma (y-x)\rvert =\lvert \gamma (x)-\gamma (y)\rvert \leq \rho \nu (\gamma ) \]

and so \(z=y-x\in \mathrm{Bohr}(\rho \cdot \nu )\).

Definition 6.3 Regularity
#

We say \(\nu :\widehat{G}\to \mathbb {R}\) is regular if, with \(d=\mathrm{rk}(\nu )\), for all \(\kappa \in \mathbb {R}\) with \(\left\lvert \kappa \right\rvert \leq 1/100d\) we have

\[ (1-100 d\left\lvert \kappa \right\rvert )\leq \frac{\left\lvert \mathrm{Bohr}((1+\kappa )\nu )\right\rvert }{\left\lvert \mathrm{Bohr}(\nu )\right\rvert }\leq (1+ 100 d\left\lvert \kappa \right\rvert ) \]
Lemma 6.4
#

For any \(\nu :\widehat{G}\to \mathbb {R}\) there exists \(\rho \in [\frac{1}{2},1]\) such that \(\rho \cdot \nu \) is regular.

Proof

To do.

Lemma 6.5

If \(B\) is a regular Bohr set of rank \(d\) and \(\mu :G\to \mathbb {R}_{\geq 0}\) is supported on \(B_\rho \), with \(\rho \in (0,1)\), then

\[ \lVert \mu _B*\mu - \mu _B \rVert _{1} \ll \rho d\lVert \mu \rVert _1. \]
Proof

To do.

Lemma 6.6

There is a constant \(c{\gt}0\) such that the following holds. Let \(B\) be a regular Bohr set of rank \(d\) and \(L\geq 1\) be any integer. If \(\nu :G\to \mathbb {R}_{\geq 0}\) is supported on \(L B_\rho \), where \(\rho \leq c/Ld\), and \(\lVert \nu \rVert _1=1\), then

\[ \mu _B \leq 2\mu _{B_{1+L\rho }}\ast \nu . \]
Proof

To do.

Lemma 6.7

There is a constant \(c{\gt}0\) such that the following holds. Let \(B\) be a regular Bohr set of rank \(d\), suppose \(A\subseteq B\) has density \(\alpha \), let \(\epsilon {\gt}0\), and suppose \(B',B''\subseteq B_\rho \) where \(\rho \leq c\alpha \epsilon /d\). Then either

  1. there is some translate \(A'\) of \(A\) such that \(\left\lvert A'\cap B'\right\rvert \geq (1-\epsilon )\alpha \left\lvert B'\right\rvert \) and \(\left\lvert A'\cap B''\right\rvert \geq (1-\epsilon )\alpha \left\lvert B''\right\rvert \), or

  2. \(\lVert 1_{A}\ast \mu _{B'}\rVert _\infty \geq (1+\epsilon /2)\alpha \), or

  3. \(\lVert 1_{A}\ast \mu _{B''}\rVert _\infty \geq (1+\epsilon /2)\alpha \).

Proof

To do.