1 Category theory
1.1 Over category
Proposition
1.1.1
Sliced adjoint functors
If is an adjunction between and and , then there is an adjunction between and .
Proof
▶
See https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sliced+adjoint+functors+–+section.
Proposition
1.1.2
Limit-preserving functors lift to over categories
Let be a shape (i.e. a category). Let denote the category which is the same as , but has an extra object which is terminal. If is a functor preserving limits of shape , then the obvious functor preserves limits of shape .
Proof
▶
Extend a functor to a functor , by letting .
Proposition
1.1.3
Essential image of a sliced functor
If is a full functor between cartesian-monoidal categories, then has the same essential image as .
1.2 Objects
1.2.1 Group objects
Proposition
1.2.1
Fully faithful product-preserving functors lift to monoid/group objects
If a finite-products-preserving functor is fully faithful, then so is .
Proof
▶
Faithfulness is immediate.
For fullness, assume is a morphism. By fullness of , find such that . is a morphism because we can pull back each diagram from to along which is faithful.
Proposition
1.2.2
Equivalences lift to monoid/group object categories
If is an equivalence of cartesian-monoidal categories, then too is an equivalence of categories.
Proposition
1.2.3
Essential image of a functor on monoid/group objects
If is a fully faithful functor between cartesian-monoidal categories, then has the same essential image as .
Lemma
1.2.4
A fully faithful functor product-preserving is a group isomorphism on hom sets
If is a fully faithful functor between cartesian-monoidal categories and are an object and a group object respectively, then is a group isomorphism.
1.2.2 Module objects
Proposition
1.2.5
Pulling back a module object
Let be two monoid objects in a monoidal category . Let be a monoid morphism. If is a -module object, then it is also a -module object.
Proof
▶
Define the multiplication as . All proofs follow easily. □